Cyber Arena

This section analyzes who holds actual control over the circulating supply year over year, with a focus on early stages where governance risk is highest. It assesses whether the governance power is centralized or decentralized, and flags any dominance by insiders or investors.

Here we analyze whether inflation rates are sustainable, how balanced the vesting release schedule, how they compare with top-performing projects annually, and how this inflationary pressure might impact token value.

Here we track the timing and size of every supply shock, we flag high, mid, and low risk supply shocks, we showcase the exact date of the largest dilution event, and enable a heatmap visualization.

This section assesses whether the TGE float is appropriately sized, what dilution it introduces, and how it compares to best performing projects. The float is also known as circulating supply (unlocks ≠ circulation)and just because tokens are unlocked doesn't mean they enter circulation.

Here we focus on everything that matters to public and private investors, how the rounds are structured, what your payback looks like at TGE, and how fairly the different rounds are balanced mapping entry price, unlocks, vesting terms, and overall exposure.

Here we analyze how balanced private rounds are, which round breaks even first and which breaks even last by tracking cumulative ROI from unlocked tokens against the initial investment, and flag the month when ROI turns positive to define each project's payback period.

Here we evaluate how liquid the tokens are at the time of unlock using the niche trading volume. A higher Exit Risk Factor means that unlocked tokens far outpace market volume, making it harder to exit a position without significant price impact. Think of this as a supply-shock tolerance framework.

Showsthe overall ranking of investment rounds based on combined metrics, including break-even speed, investment recovery at TGE, Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV).

The conclusion is the ranking of rounds from best to worst conditions.

This section compares the token's valuation and performance to other projects within the same niche. It includes ROI benchmarks from the past year, the last 15 launches, and the top 5 competitors. Based on this data, we assess whether the token's FDV is undervalued, fairly priced, or overvalued.