What is the utility of the SLING token?
Slingshot has 2 primary token utilities:
- Governance: Token = voting power in DAO proposals or protocol changes.
- Gas token: Used to pay network gas (Layer 3 chain on Arbitrum)
Discover Slingshot DAO's $SLING tokenomics, a community-driven model funding Roblox games, empowering developers, and sharing revenue with $SLING holders.
Pool Name | Percentage | Vesting Information |
|---|---|---|
| DAO Treasury | 33.03% | No information |
| Contributing Members | 23.33% | 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting |
| Token Warrants | 14.23% | 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting |
| Liquidity & Market Making | 10.00% | No information |
| Marketing & Ecosystem Growth | 5.00% | No information |
| Private Round | 4.00% | 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting |
| Founders | 3.40% | 47 Month Cliff, 1 Month Linear Vesting |
| Advisors | 2.00% | 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting |
| KOL & Public Sale | 1.87% | 33.3% at TGE , 2 Month Linear Vesting |
This section evaluates how Slingshot allocates its token supply compared to leading Gaming projects. It measures deviation across key stakeholder groups and determines whether the allocation aligns with proven benchmarks. The analysis helps assess whether SLING follows a fair and balanced distribution structure or introduces concentration risks.
This section analyzes who holds actual control over the Slingshot circulating supply year over year, with a focus on early stages where governance risk is highest. It assesses whether the governance power of SLING is centralized or decentralized, and flags any dominance by insiders or investors.
This section analyzes whether SLING token inflation is sustainable over time. We compare annual emission rates against top-performing projects, assess how balanced the vesting and unlock schedules are, and evaluate how inflationary pressure may affect long-term token value, circulating supply growth, and investor dilution.
This section tracks every SLING token unlock and dilution event across the full vesting timeline. We quantify the size and timing of each release, classify dilution risk levels (low, medium, high), and highlight the largest unlock event by date and percentage of total supply. Charts help understand emission pressure and anticipate potential supply shocks.
This section evaluates the circulating supply and emission schedule of SLING, focusing on its initial float at TGE, its dilution profile over time, and how these levels compare with top-performing projects.
This section reviews all investor fundraising rounds for Slingshot and the token purchase terms attached to SLING. It compares entry price, unlock structure, vesting length and if terms align with market standards.
This section compares the tokens valuation and performance to other projects within the same niche. It includes ROI benchmarks from the past year, the last 15 launches, and the top 5 competitors.
We compare investor valuations using both Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV) models to assess pricing from two key perspectives. The round that ranks highest across both valuation models is considered the best-valued round.
This section evaluates how fast investors recover their initial capital across Slingshot's private rounds. We track cumulative ROI from token unlocks, identify which rounds break even first or last, and pinpoint the month when ROI becomes positive to assess payback speed and round attractiveness.
This section ranks all investment rounds based on key investor metrics, including break-even speed, recovery at TGE, Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV). Each round is scored and ordered from most to least favorable, showing which round offers the strongest conditions for investors in Slingshot.
This section analyzes whether the SLING token has a clear economic role within the ecosystem, and more importantly, why users would hold it over time instead of treating it as a purely speculative asset. We evaluate what utility the token provides, which functions it enables, and how it solves real problems across the network.
Utility Type | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Token = voting power in DAO proposals or protocol changes. | |
| Gas token | Used to pay network gas (Layer 3 chain on Arbitrum) | |
| Access / Feature Unlock | Token is required to access features, or tiers in a protocol. | |
| Staking (Consensus) | Network runs on PoS, so staking them gives an APY. | |
| Medium of Payment | Token is used to pay for services, transactions, or products. |
Value Accrual | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Buyback and Burn | Mechanism for buying back and burning tokens. | |
| Buyback and LP | Mechanism for buying back and LPing tokens. | |
| Fee Redistribution | A portion of fees (from trading, etc.) is shared with holders | |
| ve-Token Models | Governance | |
| Revenue Share | Protocol revenue is shared with the holders. |
This section is one of the most important layers: it analyzes whether Slingshot (SLING) captures and retains on-chain value and how effectively that value flows back to the token. We examine fee redistribution, staking rewards, buyback mechanisms, burn models, and whether the protocol creates real token sinks that reduce sell pressure over time.
Slingshot has 2 primary token utilities:
Slingshot token distribution allocates 5,000,000,000 SLING across 5 primary stakeholder groups:
SLING uses variable cliffs and vesting schedules that change depending on the allocation:
1.9% of the total supply (96,000,000 SLING) is unlocked at TGE, with the tokens split between Community and Public Sale.
Slingshot has a total supply of 5,000,000,000 SLING, of which 1,293,500,002 SLING (25.9% of total) is currently circulating.
Total length of the full Slingshot emission schedule is 5 years, with 37.22% released in Year 1, while the remaining 14.75% is released over the following 4 years.
Slingshot has 4 investor rounds, with the following investment price and vesting:
29.6% of the Slingshot supply is allocated to community focused pools such as Contributing Members, Marketing & Ecosystem Growth, and Airdrop Campaign.
Slingshot DAO revolutionizes game development and ownership within the Roblox ecosystem through its innovative $SLING tokenomics model. As a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), Slingshot combines the power of community governance, AI-enhanced tools, and game funding to identify and support the next wave of billion-dollar gaming concepts. The $SLING token serves as the backbone of Slingshot’s ecosystem, enabling holders to actively participate in decision-making processes. Developers submit game proposals, which are then vetted and voted on by the $SLING community. The most promising ideas receive funding and development support, ensuring that the best concepts rise to the top. One of Slingshot DAO’s standout features is its commitment to full community ownership. All funded games are owned collectively by $SLING token holders, allowing revenue generated from game successes to be funneled back to the community. This unique economic model not only incentivizes players and developers but also creates a mutually beneficial relationship within the ecosystem. Slingshot also leverages AI tools to enhance the overall game development process, streamlining concept analysis and improving project quality. Members benefit from a seamless experience where their token holdings translate directly into influence over the future of game development. Whether you're a game developer, investor, or avid gamer, Slingshot DAO opens new doors for innovation, collaboration, and profit-sharing in the $200 billion+ gaming industry. With $SLING tokens, users gain access to a thriving ecosystem dedicated to shaping the future of Roblox gaming while promoting fairness, inclusivity, and community-driven success.
This tokenomics data is maintained by Tokenomics.com and updated automatically from our analytics engine.
Page last updated: