Slingshot Tokenomics

Pre-Investment Audit Scope Badge

SLING Overview & Token Details

Discover Slingshot DAO's $SLING tokenomics, a community-driven model funding Roblox games, empowering developers, and sharing revenue with $SLING holders.

Ticker
$SLING
Listing Price
$0.015
Total Supply
5,000,000,000
Niche
  • Gaming
  • AI
TGE Date
2025-03-18
Tier 3
Tokenomics
Pre-Investment
Audit
Tokenomics
Audited
Investor
Information

Tokenomics Rating

Rank
#1920
Percentile
Top 99%
13
5
6
Economic Policies
15.65
Investment & Valuation
46.41
Utility & Value Flow
9.46
Liquidity & Market Making
-
Distribution Fairness
20.74

Tokenomics Structure (Token Supply, Allocation & Vesting Overview)

Allocation Distribution

Pool Name
Percentage
Vesting Information
DAO Treasury33.03%No information
Contributing Members23.33%2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
Token Warrants14.23%2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
Liquidity & Market Making10.00%No information
Marketing & Ecosystem Growth5.00%No information
Private Round4.00%2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
Founders3.40%47 Month Cliff, 1 Month Linear Vesting
Advisors2.00%2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
KOL & Public Sale1.87%33.3% at TGE , 2 Month Linear Vesting
Showing 1-9 out of 11

Category Score
20.74out of 100
Percentile
Top 92%

Allocation Distribution Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
1
Alerts
1

Distribution Fairness

Token Allocation Benchmarks (vs Top Projects)

Token Allocation Deviation Analysis

Deviation Status

Public Sale
-4.6%
Low
Community
-9.1%
Medium
Foundation
+21.0%
High
Insiders
-12.9%
High
Investors
+5.7%
Medium

Token Allocation Deviation Analysis

This section evaluates how Slingshot allocates its token supply compared to leading Gaming projects. It measures deviation across key stakeholder groups and determines whether the allocation aligns with proven benchmarks. The analysis helps assess whether SLING follows a fair and balanced distribution structure or introduces concentration risks.

Overall Deviation Status

High

Category Score
out of 100
Percentile

Governance Indicators

Highlights
2
Warnings
0
Alerts
1

Token Power

Token Governance Concentration Analysis

This section analyzes who holds actual control over the Slingshot circulating supply year over year, with a focus on early stages where governance risk is highest. It assesses whether the governance power of SLING is centralized or decentralized, and flags any dominance by insiders or investors.

Token Control Status

Launch
Decentralized
Year 1
Decentralized
Year 2
Decentralized
Year 3
Decentralized
Year 4
Decentralized

Insider Dominance Test

Passed

Investor Dominance Test

Failed

Category Score
8.75out of 100
Percentile
Top 97%

Inflation Indicators

Highlights
3
Warnings
0
Alerts
1

Emission Type

Circulation

Token Inflation (Annual Analysis)

This section analyzes whether SLING token inflation is sustainable over time. We compare annual emission rates against top-performing projects, assess how balanced the vesting and unlock schedules are, and evaluate how inflationary pressure may affect long-term token value, circulating supply growth, and investor dilution.

Year 1 Inflation

2032.2%

Year 2 Inflation

18.5%

Year 3 Inflation

0.0%

Year 4 Inflation

0.0%

Inflation YoY

Category Score
20.32out of 100
Percentile
Top 82%

Supply Shock Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
1
Alerts
1

Emission Type

Circulation

Monthly Supply Shocks

Token Unlock & Dilution Events

This section tracks every SLING token unlock and dilution event across the full vesting timeline. We quantify the size and timing of each release, classify dilution risk levels (low, medium, high), and highlight the largest unlock event by date and percentage of total supply. Charts help understand emission pressure and anticipate potential supply shocks.

Supply Shocks Counter

1 Low Risk
3 Mid Risk
4 High Risk

Highest Supply Shock

119.3%
at Month 3

Detailed Information

Category Score
20.13out of 100
Percentile
Top 78%

Risk of Dilution Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
0
Alerts
1

Token Emission, Float and Circulating Supply Analysis

This section evaluates the circulating supply and emission schedule of SLING, focusing on its initial float at TGE, its dilution profile over time, and how these levels compare with top-performing projects.

Initial Float

1.92%

Best Performer Float

12.34%

Team Float Control

0.0%
Low Control
Mid Control
High Control
At launch, the team controls 0.0% of the circulating supply, reducing the real initial float to 1.92%.

Circulating Token Supply (YoY)

Vesting Release Schedule

Category Score
46.41out of 100
Percentile
Top 87%

Terms and Conditions Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
0
Alerts
0

Investor Round Details

Token Sale Terms and Vesting Details

This section reviews all investor fundraising rounds for Slingshot and the token purchase terms attached to SLING. It compares entry price, unlock structure, vesting length and if terms align with market standards.

Vesting Details

Hover to see the details.
Token Warrants
Private Round
KOL & Public Sale
Seed Round

Target Hardcap

$15.9M
21.9%
78.1%
Slingshot is selling 21.9% of its total token supply to investors in order to raise $15.9M in funding.

Category Score
39.05out of 100
Percentile
Top 86%

Valuation Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
1
Alerts
1

Valuation Comparison

This section compares the tokens valuation and performance to other projects within the same niche. It includes ROI benchmarks from the past year, the last 15 launches, and the top 5 competitors.

Niche ROI (Past Year Gaming)

-15.97%

Niche ROI (Last 15 Gaming)

+29.51%

Project FDV Status

Overvalued
Under
Fairly Valued
Over
Slingshot is listing at 236.9% higher FDV compared to benchmark listing and current valuation averages.

Valuation Comparison

Valuation (FDV vs VDV)

We compare investor valuations using both Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV) models to assess pricing from two key perspectives. The round that ranks highest across both valuation models is considered the best-valued round.

Preferred Round

KOL & Public Sale
Best
Out of 4
1
Ranked 1st by VDV
1
Ranked 1st by FDV

Rounds Ranked by FDV

1
KOL & Public Sale
$50.0M FDV
2
Seed Round
$70.0M FDV
3
Private Round
$75.0M FDV
3
Token Warrants
$75.0M FDV

Rounds Ranked by VDV

1
KOL & Public Sale
$1.6M VDV
2
Seed Round
$34.0M VDV
3
Private Round
$36.4M VDV
3
Token Warrants
$36.4M VDV

Investor FDV vs VDV

VDV Valuation Model

Category Score
48.82out of 100
Percentile
Top 73%

Break Even Indicators

Highlights
2
Warnings
1
Alerts
0

Break-Even Analysis

This section evaluates how fast investors recover their initial capital across Slingshot's private rounds. We track cumulative ROI from token unlocks, identify which rounds break even first or last, and pinpoint the month when ROI becomes positive to assess payback speed and round attractiveness.

Fastest Rounds to Break Even

1
KOL & Public Sale
in 1 months
2
Seed Round
in 14 months
2
Private Round
in 14 months
2
Token Warrants
in 14 months

Who Breaks Even First?

KOL & Public Sale
in 1 months

Who Breaks Even Last?

Seed Round
in 14 months

Break-Even Analysis Chart

Investment Recovery at TGE

Price Performance to Break Even at TGE

Category Score
out of 100
Percentile

Conclusions Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
1
Alerts
0

Investor Round Ranking

This section ranks all investment rounds based on key investor metrics, including break-even speed, recovery at TGE, Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV). Each round is scored and ordered from most to least favorable, showing which round offers the strongest conditions for investors in Slingshot.

Most Favorable Round

KOL & Public Sale
Best
Out of 4
1
Ranked 1st by TGE Recovery
1
Ranked 1st by Vesting Speed
1
Ranked 1st by FDV
1
Ranked 1st by VDV

Least Favorable Round

Private Round
Worst
Out of 4
2
Ranked 2nd by TGE Recovery
2
Ranked 2nd by Vesting Speed
3
Ranked 3rd by FDV
3
Ranked 3rd by VDV

Investor Round Ranking

Category Score
25.23out of 100
Percentile

Token Utility Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
0
Alerts
2

Token Utility Overview

This section analyzes whether the SLING token has a clear economic role within the ecosystem, and more importantly, why users would hold it over time instead of treating it as a purely speculative asset. We evaluate what utility the token provides, which functions it enables, and how it solves real problems across the network.

Utility Score

25.23
Weak

Value Flow

Poor
Utility Type
Status
Description
Governance
Token = voting power in DAO proposals or protocol changes.
Gas token
Used to pay network gas (Layer 3 chain on Arbitrum)
Access / Feature Unlock
Token is required to access features, or tiers in a protocol.
Staking (Consensus)
Network runs on PoS, so staking them gives an APY.
Medium of Payment
Token is used to pay for services, transactions, or products.
Showing 1-5 out of 5

Category Score
1.57out of 100
Percentile

Value Capture Indicators

Highlights
1
Warnings
0
Alerts
2
Value Accrual
Status
Description
Buyback and Burn
Mechanism for buying back and burning tokens.
Buyback and LP
Mechanism for buying back and LPing tokens.
Fee Redistribution
A portion of fees (from trading, etc.) is shared with holders
ve-Token Models
Governance
Revenue Share
Protocol revenue is shared with the holders.
Showing 1-5 out of 5

Token Buybacks, Burns & Value Accrual

This section is one of the most important layers: it analyzes whether Slingshot (SLING) captures and retains on-chain value and how effectively that value flows back to the token. We examine fee redistribution, staking rewards, buyback mechanisms, burn models, and whether the protocol creates real token sinks that reduce sell pressure over time.

Value Accrual

Poor

Value Capture

Poor

SLING Tokenomics FAQ – Key Questions About Slingshot

What is the utility of the SLING token?

Slingshot has 2 primary token utilities:

  • Governance: Token = voting power in DAO proposals or protocol changes.
  • Gas token: Used to pay network gas (Layer 3 chain on Arbitrum)

What is the token allocation for SLING?

Slingshot token distribution allocates 5,000,000,000 SLING across 5 primary stakeholder groups:

  • Foundation: 43.03% (DAO Treasury 33.03%, Liquidity & Market Making 10.00%)
  • Community: 29.63% (Contributing Members 23.33%, Marketing & Ecosystem Growth 5.00%, Airdrop Campaign 1.30%)
  • Investors: 20.07% (Token Warrants 14.23%, Private Round 4.00%, Seed Round 1.84%)
  • Insiders: 5.40% (Founders 3.40%, Advisors 2.00%)
  • Public Sale: 1.87% (KOL & Public Sale 1.87%)

What is the vesting schedule for SLING?

SLING uses variable cliffs and vesting schedules that change depending on the allocation:

  • DAO Treasury: No information
  • Contributing Members: 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • Token Warrants: 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • Liquidity & Market Making: No information
  • Marketing & Ecosystem Growth: No information
  • Private Round: 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • Founders: 47 Month Cliff, 1 Month Linear Vesting
  • Advisors: 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • KOL & Public Sale: 33.3% at TGE , 2 Month Linear Vesting
  • Seed Round: 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • Airdrop Campaign: 100.0% at TGE

How many SLING tokens unlock at TGE?

1.9% of the total supply (96,000,000 SLING) is unlocked at TGE, with the tokens split between Community and Public Sale.

What is the total supply and circulating supply of SLING?

Slingshot has a total supply of 5,000,000,000 SLING, of which 1,293,500,002 SLING (25.9% of total) is currently circulating.

What is the token emission schedule for SLING?

Total length of the full Slingshot emission schedule is 5 years, with 37.22% released in Year 1, while the remaining 14.75% is released over the following 4 years.

What are the investor terms for SLING private and seed rounds?

Slingshot has 4 investor rounds, with the following investment price and vesting:

  • Seed Round: priced at $0.014, with 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • Private Round: priced at $0.015, with 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting
  • KOL & Public Sale: priced at $0.01, with 33.33% at TGE, 33.3% at TGE , 2 Month Linear Vesting
  • Token Warrants: priced at $0.015, with 2 Month Cliff, 12 Month Linear Vesting

What percentage of SLING is allocated to the community?

29.6% of the Slingshot supply is allocated to community focused pools such as Contributing Members, Marketing & Ecosystem Growth, and Airdrop Campaign.

What is Slingshot (SLING)?

Slingshot DAO revolutionizes game development and ownership within the Roblox ecosystem through its innovative $SLING tokenomics model. As a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), Slingshot combines the power of community governance, AI-enhanced tools, and game funding to identify and support the next wave of billion-dollar gaming concepts. The $SLING token serves as the backbone of Slingshot’s ecosystem, enabling holders to actively participate in decision-making processes. Developers submit game proposals, which are then vetted and voted on by the $SLING community. The most promising ideas receive funding and development support, ensuring that the best concepts rise to the top. One of Slingshot DAO’s standout features is its commitment to full community ownership. All funded games are owned collectively by $SLING token holders, allowing revenue generated from game successes to be funneled back to the community. This unique economic model not only incentivizes players and developers but also creates a mutually beneficial relationship within the ecosystem. Slingshot also leverages AI tools to enhance the overall game development process, streamlining concept analysis and improving project quality. Members benefit from a seamless experience where their token holdings translate directly into influence over the future of game development. Whether you're a game developer, investor, or avid gamer, Slingshot DAO opens new doors for innovation, collaboration, and profit-sharing in the $200 billion+ gaming industry. With $SLING tokens, users gain access to a thriving ecosystem dedicated to shaping the future of Roblox gaming while promoting fairness, inclusivity, and community-driven success.

This tokenomics data is maintained by Tokenomics.com and updated automatically from our analytics engine.

Page last updated: