Explore Shrapnel's token economy: Play, create, own, and trade with $SHRAP in a dynamic, community-driven ecosystem.
Pool Name | Percentage | Vesting Information |
|---|---|---|
| Community Rewards | 33.00% | 60m Linear Vesting |
| Team and Advisors | 27.00% | 12m Cliff, 36m Linear Vesting |
| Seed Token Holders | 20.00% | 12m Cliff, 20m Linear Vesting |
| Ecosystem Fund | 8.50% | 6m Cliff, 36m Linear Vesting |
| Strategic Token Holders | 7.00% | 12m Cliff, 20m Linear Vesting |
| Liquidity And MM | 3.00% | 100.0% at TGE |
| Public Airdrop | 1.50% | 100.0% at TGE |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
This section evaluates how Shrapnel allocates its token supply compared to leading Gaming projects. It measures deviation across key stakeholder groups and determines whether the allocation aligns with proven benchmarks. The analysis helps assess whether SHRAP follows a fair and balanced distribution structure or introduces concentration risks.
This section analyzes who holds actual control over the Shrapnel circulating supply year over year, with a focus on early stages where governance risk is highest. It assesses whether the governance power of SHRAP is centralized or decentralized, and flags any dominance by insiders or investors.
This section analyzes whether SHRAP token inflation is sustainable over time. We compare annual emission rates against top-performing projects, assess how balanced the vesting and unlock schedules are, and evaluate how inflationary pressure may affect long-term token value, circulating supply growth, and investor dilution.
This section tracks every SHRAP token unlock and dilution event across the full vesting timeline. We quantify the size and timing of each release, classify dilution risk levels (low, medium, high), and highlight the largest unlock event by date and percentage of total supply. Charts help understand emission pressure and anticipate potential supply shocks.
This section evaluates the circulating supply and emission schedule of SHRAP, focusing on its initial float at TGE, its dilution profile over time, and how these levels compare with top-performing projects.
This section reviews all investor fundraising rounds for Shrapnel and the token purchase terms attached to SHRAP. It compares entry price, unlock structure, vesting length and if terms align with market standards.
This section compares the tokens valuation and performance to other projects within the same niche. It includes ROI benchmarks from the past year, the last 15 launches, and the top 5 competitors.
We compare investor valuations using both Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV) models to assess pricing from two key perspectives. The round that ranks highest across both valuation models is considered the best-valued round.
This section ranks all investment rounds based on key investor metrics, including break-even speed, recovery at TGE, Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV), and Vested Diluted Valuation (VDV). Each round is scored and ordered from most to least favorable, showing which round offers the strongest conditions for investors in Shrapnel.
This section analyzes whether the SHRAP token has a clear economic role within the ecosystem, and more importantly, why users would hold it over time instead of treating it as a purely speculative asset. We evaluate what utility the token provides, which functions it enables, and how it solves real problems across the network.
Utility Type | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Token holders participate in Radon Network Guidance DAO decisions for game development | |
| Gas Fee | Required for transactions on the Shrapnel subnet (on Avalanche) | |
| Medium of Exchange | Default currency for trades on the Shrapnel marketplace | |
| Staking (DPoS) | No network consensus staking for holders | |
| Access / Feature Unlock | Core gameplay accessible without tokens |
Value Accrual | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Burn | No token burn mechanisms despite marketplace activity and gas usage | |
| Buyback and LP | No buyback program or liquidity provision mechanisms identified | |
| Fee Redistribution | Transaction fees go to protocol, not redistributed to holders | |
| ve-Token Models | No vote-escrowed tokenomics implemented | |
| Revenue Share | Content creators earn from marketplace sales, but no direct holder revenue share |
This section is one of the most important layers: it analyzes whether Shrapnel (SHRAP) captures and retains on-chain value and how effectively that value flows back to the token. We examine fee redistribution, staking rewards, buyback mechanisms, burn models, and whether the protocol creates real token sinks that reduce sell pressure over time.
Shrapnel has 3 primary token utilities:
Shrapnel token distribution allocates 3,000,000,000 SHRAP across 4 primary stakeholder groups:
SHRAP uses variable cliffs and vesting schedules that change depending on the allocation:
4.5% of the total supply (135,000,000 SHRAP) is unlocked at TGE, with the tokens split between Foundation and Community.
Shrapnel has a total supply of 3,000,000,000 SHRAP, of which 2,004,083,325 SHRAP (66.8% of total) is currently circulating.
Total length of the full Shrapnel emission schedule is 6 years, with 11.97% released in Year 1, while the remaining 88.03% is released over the following 5 years.
Shrapnel has 2 investor rounds, with the following investment price and vesting:
34.5% of the Shrapnel supply is allocated to community focused pools such as Community Rewards and Public Airdrop.
Shrapnel is pioneering a dynamic, multi-faceted economic ecosystem that invites gamers, creators, curators, and landowners to engage deeply with its innovative platform. Through the Shrapnel economy, participants can engage in play, creation, ownership, and governance, all while being incentivized by the native token, $SHRAP. Players immerse themselves in Shrapnel's universe, purchasing gear or extracting valuable items during game sessions. These assets are then tradeable in the SHRAPNEL Marketplace for $SHRAP, providing a rewarding experience for active participants. Creators flourish by designing a range of assets, from vanity items to bespoke weapons, maps, and intricate map objects, monetizing their efforts and driving economic vitality within the platform. Their innovation not only stimulates market activity but fosters a collaborative environment where their creations gain value and recognition. Curators add another layer to this vibrant ecosystem by identifying high-quality content that resonates with the community. Their discerning eye ensures quality control and exposes players to the best of what Shrapnel has to offer, while earning their own share of the game's economic rewards. Landowners complete this intricate network by making substantial investments in the ecosystem. They not only secure a portion of the economic benefits generated but also contribute significantly to the platform's infrastructure and growth, creating a stable foundation for the ecosystem's continuous evolution. At its core, Shrapnel's tokenomics embody a virtuous cycle propelled by community interaction and contribution. As more personas join, the economic activity intensifies, uncovering new opportunities for collaboration and discovery that perpetuates the ecosystem's expansion. With $SHRAP, the platform promises a robust, user-driven economic landscape built on innovation, engagement, and shared success.
This tokenomics data is maintained by Tokenomics.com and updated automatically from our analytics engine.
Page last updated:
